KD900/KD900+ Remote Maker Review

Have collected user experience of KD900 and KD900+ remote makers:

 

KD900 vs KD200:

COMPARE WITH kd200 ,

KD900 CAN CHECK THE frequency of remotes

can copy the rolling code and fixed code remote of garage.

can support smart match for remotes, in other words if come a car

and you do not know wut remotes to choose, just use smart match it will pop out the correct remotes.

 

KD900+ vs KD900:

KD900+’s has new features:

the possibility to clone most fixed coded garage, home alarm and car alarm remotes.

and it’s pwered by 4*AA batteries with a battery life indicator on the main screen

 

KD900 review:

 

  1. good:

KD900 is a good tool to have, but don’t forget it’s able to generate remotes ready for programming, it’s not a key programmer, you will need several key programmers as well to offer a good service.

 

  1. great with a key programmer for Ford:

I have the KD900, and it is a great piece of kit. But once you have created the remote, unless you are doing a ford remote, you’ll need a diagnostics programmer. I use a Keyscan and an old Advance Diagnostics AD100 which could do with a bit more software on it to be honest.

 

  1. great for Mazda:

quite a few have manual remote procedures , plenty of vag , some honda, some jag etc , but the ones that made the most for me over the years on manual procedure are mazda , great for mazda. theres alot more than ford that have manual processes .

 

  1. PSA 46 chip works:

the nb psa with integrated 46 chip have saved me a fortune and stronger than oem remotes , these you do need diag for chip but manual process on remote .

 

  1. KD900+ works great:

I’ve kd900+ and also works great, but you need good battery in smartphone – during “online” generating eat power like crazy. If you want buy better look for local dealers than aliexpress – on trade locks they sell it for about 100pounds. If you don’t need extra function like frequency meter or garage remotes cloning you can also look for kd mini – i’ve also got one and it works.

 

  1. Subaru legacy 2008:

Subaru legacy 2008 worked a treat using Suburu 02 and cutting it on hu83!

 

  1. 2001 estate, 2002 hatch and 2003 estate:

Programmed 3 astra remotes in the last 2 weeks. 2001 estate, 2002 hatch and 2003 estate with alarm. All OK

Don’t know what kind of remote programmed but the 03 with alarm was online. Probably Delphi

 

  1. Civic 2009-2013:

i use civic 2009-2013 and worked ok

 

 

  1. sharan with 7m3:

I made today one sharan with 7m3. Only problem was that I have to repeat procedure 2 or 3 times. Where was problem i don’t know – maybe in time between clicks or pushing time.

 

  1. 2012 Skoda 5th immo:

I programmed year 2012 with 5 generation skoda.

Also worked the vw ..202ad

 

  1. 7M3:

Today tried to make 7M3, generated like 5 -6 pieces, generate success, but none of them accept by the car :/

 

  1. Mini Cooper:

There are two remotes for Mini Cooper listed in KD Mobile app, 315MHz and 433 MHz.

 

  1. Civic:

I used kd-x2 to clone the civic

I clone it on nb multifunction, that’s why I was thinking that the remote will be cloned as well.

 

  1. Toyota Aygo 2007:

Toyota Aygo 2007 remote works ok with KD900

KD900 remote maker toyota 600x449 - KD900/KD900+ Remote Maker Review - KD900/KD900+ Remote Maker Review

 

Tech support from obdexpress.co.uk:

use the manual procedure for the remote with KD900 remote maker:

programmed key in the ignition and switch ignition on

lock door with 2nd key manually

press unlock button once

wait 5 seconds then press unlock button once again

now open door manually , switch ignition off and remove key and test the remote functions.

 

if programming 2 remotes , when you do second one follow same procedure but press unlock twice each time instead of once

 

also make sure you are using the correct remote , on that year it may be 1J0 959753N but could also be 1J0 959753 DA or AH , and can also be 1J0 959753 CT or AG

(Visited 217 times, 1 visits today)
favicon - KD900/KD900+ Remote Maker Review - KD900/KD900+ Remote Maker Review